Web lists-archives.com

Re: Bug with .gitignore and branch switching




Junio C Hamano wrote:

> There is no "untracked but precious" vs "untracked and expendable"
> difference in the current system.  An untracked file that matches
> patterns listed in .gitignore is treated as the latter.
[...]
> We've discussed the lack of "untracked but precious" class a few
> times on the list in the past, but I do not recall the topic came up
> in the recent past.  It perhaps is because nobody found that class
> useful enough so far.

The most recent example I can find is 2010:
http://public-inbox.org/git/4C6A1C5B.4030304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/.

It also came up in 2007:
http://public-inbox.org/git/C0E9F681E68D48EB8989022D11FEE3D1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Earlier in that year it even made the "What's not in 1.5.2" list.
http://public-inbox.org/git/11793556383977-git-send-email-junkio@xxxxxxx/

Perhaps those references could be a useful starting point for an
interested person's thinking.

Jonathan