Web lists-archives.com

Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?




Quoting Erik Christiansen (2019-05-04 08:43:53)
> >From the pmount manpage for stretch:
> 
> »
>  pmount device [ label ]
> 
>  This will mount device to a directory below /media if policy is met
>  (see below). If  label is given, the mount point will be /media/label,
>  otherwise it will be /media/device.
> «
> 
>  There doesn't seem to be an option for pmount to mount at
>  /media/label_read_from_the_media
> 
>  To provide that convenient automation, I use:
> 
>  $ which lmount
>  lmount is a function
>  lmount () 
>  { 
>      pmount $1 `e2label $1`
>  }

I recommend to install package shellcheck and run "shellcheck lmount".

>  Is it worth adding a pmount option to provide that simple but useful 
>  convenience for general consumption?

I don't personally use pmount since some years, but that sure sounds 
like a nice suggestion: Please consider filing as a bugreport against 
pmount with severity "wishlist".

More info at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature