Web lists-archives.com

Re: debian-9.5.0-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso missing files for install without mirror




Brian wrote:
>On Sun 04 Nov 2018 at 00:20:27 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
>> Le 03/11/2018 à 21:24, Brian a écrit :
>> > On Sat 03 Nov 2018 at 19:40:14 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > It appears that the latest update gave mutt "standard" priority back.
>> > > 
>> > > Package: mutt
>> > > Version: 1.7.2-1+deb9u1
>> > > (...)
>> > > Priority: standard
>> > > 
>> > > Package: mutt
>> > > Version: 1.7.2-1
>> > > (...)
>> > > Priority: optional
>> > > 
>> > > The Debian changelog does not mention this change.
>> 
>> Checking in mutt_1.7.2-1+deb9u1_i386.deb, the priority has not changed.
>> 
>> > I believe the changelog would not mention overrides. It is not a package
>> > maintainer matter.
>> 
>> Why then did the priority override change for a stable security update ?
>
>Pass.
>
>wget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/indices/override.stretch.main.gz

Right. But if you compare the metdata for mutt in the relevant
Packages files, there is a mismatch. From current stable:

Package: mutt
Version: 1.7.2-1
Installed-Size: 6104
Maintainer: Mutt maintainers <pkg-mutt-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Architecture: amd64
...
Priority: optional
Filename: pool/main/m/mutt/mutt_1.7.2-1_amd64.deb
Size: 1562454
MD5sum: ba99d07da2382c1861533e4a55ebe6f8
SHA256: b4032390b6e0347863558015f2c5dfff19af61145d745351c30be66932d2a9c2


And from stable-security:

Package: mutt
Version: 1.7.2-1+deb9u1
Installed-Size: 6108
Maintainer: Mutt maintainers <pkg-mutt-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Architecture: amd64
...
Priority: standard
Filename: pool/updates/main/m/mutt/mutt_1.7.2-1+deb9u1_amd64.deb
Size: 1564182
MD5sum: aa2aa9266ed488bc57e486497dcde2b0
SHA1: 4dac8ed3ec8dd50de65ff3cb07eef1963d3e96c0
SHA256: 749a070599b56c923c514cd7b9fab6f94b01c662a9c5c93182366f81990f4d87

which suggests there may be a problem with overrides in the security
archive. The overrides file for security isn't available to look at
directly to check...

I'll talk to the ftp team and see what's going on...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@xxxxxxxxxx
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
 whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
 Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html