Re: dual port cross over cable bonding
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:46:15 -0400
- From: Dan Ritter <dsr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: dual port cross over cable bonding
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30
> All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding
> > Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong.
> > Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that
> > one is .1 and the other is .2?
Also, balance-rr is in conflict with layer3+4.