Re: ext2 for /boot ??? -- WAS: Re: root on ZFS
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:23:44 +0000
- From: Matthew Crews <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ext2 for /boot ??? -- WAS: Re: root on ZFS
My thought process is that there's no reason for any advanced features in /boot since it should rarely change (aside from the occasional kernel or driver update).
That said, theres no real harm in using a different filesystem for /boot, such as ext3, ext4, btrfs, etc., so long as your bootloader (ie GRUB) can read files from it.
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
-------- Original Message --------
On Sep 11, 2018, 11:01, Andrew McGlashan < andrew.mcglashan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/09/18 22:48, Matthew Crews wrote:
> My recommendation is to use a separate /boot partition and make it EXT2.
Why not at least ext3? I don't baulk at ext4 btw for /boot -- I can
never understand why ext2 is recommended when ext4 gives no trouble and
has other advantages, even ext3 has journaling that ext2 does not.