Re: session trunking with NFS
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:31:25 +0300
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: session trunking with NFS
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:09:48AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Personally I'd rather use conventional network bonding on NFS server,
> > and be done with it.
> Conventional network bonding doesn't speed up a single stream, which is why
> people have been looking for alternatives.
That's something I agree with.
But the way I see the things, if one's really needs I/O bandwidth, low
latency and IOPS done in consumer-grade hardware, one should use FCoE,
not NFS. Especially if that's 'one initiator - one target'
NFS was designed for multiple clients concurrently accessing the sames
shares, and in this scenario bonding seems much more simplier and