Re: some questions about cfengine3
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:24:24 +0200
- From: <tomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: some questions about cfengine3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:44:18PM +0200, Morel Bérenger wrote:
> Le Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:15:41 +0200,
> <tomas@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > It really depends on your needs/tastes/team.
> I am not really constrained about mass storage (I mean, embedding a
> Debian system on 1Gb is easy enough, and our systems does not have less
> than 4Gb) but on bandwidth, so I guess I'm better to go with the
> smallest (considering that no, python is not needed in our systems and
> so, absent), cfengine3 according to you?
True. I do usually use "size" as a very rough metric for "complexity",
so I tend to look first at the smallest package. That said...
> Also, I'm the only one at work which have ever heard of that kind
> of tools, so I'm basically free to take whatever I want, and I've never
> really cared about «coolness» of systems.
> If I could only work with softwares that are older than me and simple
> enough to not require updates every 2 months, I would be a happy coder.
... I've seen others using puppet and ansible, but can't provide you
with first-hand experience, sorry.
> Thanks for the informations.
I wish I could be more helpful, sorry.
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----