Web lists-archives.com

Re: Broken kernel?

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:51:07AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:

> Call off the dogs, you and several other are correct, and I should not be 
> posting bad info at 3 or 4 am when the only reason I'm up at all is to 
> take the recyclables to the curb. Its just that I've been running the 32 
> bit versions so well for more than half a decade I was convinced that 
> was the way to fly.

I wasn't aiming no set the dogs on anybody, merely looking to clarify
that amd64 packages aren't only for AMD processors or 32-bit packages
only for 32-bit processors.

Indeed, I still run 32-bit on a couple of 64-bit capable systems due to
the factors that they were originally built on 32-bit hardware and their
configuration and workload really wouldn't benefit in any real terms
from 64-bit, so the work involved in the transfer wouldn't be well


1: No code table for op: ++post

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature