Re: libgparted bug.
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 16:53:25 +0100
- From: "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: libgparted bug.
and again a miscalculation by differing block sizes.
The adventurous proposal would be useless because working somewhere
in the still undamaged part of the image file.
skip= and seek= must be the numbers for blocks of 512 bytes rather than
of 64 KiB.
So this proposal should have been
dd if=/dev/sdd bs=512 skip=16500703 count=66 \
Have a nice day :)