Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 16:47:41 +0000
- From: Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Kernel for Spectre and Meltdown
On 3 February 2018 at 15:37, Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I missed this the first go-round. My interpretation of Andy'sOn 2/3/18, rhkramer@xxxxxxxxx <rhkramer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Debian
>> > already has a place to test the latest and greatest (and most
>> > broken) versions of packages and it is not the stable release that
>> > new users are directed at.
>> Do you mean that new users on average want to install testing etc rather
>> than stable?
> I shouldn't profess to speak for someone else, but I think he meant just the
> opposite. (I guess, to be fair, it could be read either way, but the
> or something makes me favor my interpretation.)
observation is that something cognitive about how certain pages read
*might* accidentally point new users toward.. unstable and/or testing?
I am intrigued here..... I actually upgraded to sid myself to try to install these new kernels.
Maybe there is some kind of subtle subliminal force drawing me to do this here that I was not aware of.
This could turn out to be more interesting than the discussion about the kernel installations themselves.
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* runs with duct tape *