Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:47:05 -0800
- From: Rick Thomas <rick.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Tom Dial wrote:
> On 12/27/2017 04:57 AM, Matthew Crews wrote:
> > I wouldn't trust BTRFS in an enterprise environment, but I have good experience in a personal environment. Make sure you are using modern kernels though (I wouldn't use anything earlier than 4.4, and realistically I would use 4.9 or 4.13 or higher), and I definitely would not use RAID5/6.
> > For an enterprise environment, ZFS wins, hands down.
> Based on prior experience with ZFS under Solaris and FreeBSD, I've been
> considering the possibility of using it with Debian now that it is
> pretty much a first class file system.
> Reports of actual use, pointers, and gotchas, if any, would be useful to
> me and probably others.
> Tom Dial
Since it doesn't look like I'll be using BTRFS for my application, I too would appreciate hearing about experiences with ZFS as an alternative. Unfortunately, the application we're using is only available for CentOS-6, so we'll have to pressure the developer to release his CentOS-7 code, but we've got a year to do it, so it's probably do-able.
Thanks in advance!