Re: Btrs vs ext4. Which one is more reliable?
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:23:04 -0400
- From: Gary Dale <garydale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Btrs vs ext4. Which one is more reliable?
On 10/08/17 09:44 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 10 Aug 2017 at 07:04:09 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:46:09PM -0400, David Niklas wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 04:59:40 +0000
Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, my use case is at home where the power can and *does* fail. I also
find myself using the latest kernel and oftentimes an experimental driver
for my AMD graphics card, hence my need for a *very* stable fs over
Buy a cheap UPS with a USB or serial connection to your
computer. Even if it only supplies power for 2 minutes, that's
enough time for the computer to receive the power outage signal
and do an orderly shutdown.
Two minutes barely covers the timeouts that can often occur when
shutting down systemd; the commonest timeout period here seems
to be 90 seconds. I wouldn't mind reducing them if that's possible.
Processes got just a few seconds with sysvinit before they were
Still it is sufficient to do an orderly shutdown when power is lost
and your network hardware might be off.
The bigger issue is why would anyone use experimental drivers and the
latest kernel when they are worried about reliability?