Web lists-archives.com

Re: Please help me resize my ext4 file system to size > 16TB




On 06/13/2017 10:48 AM, Doug wrote:

On 06/12/2017 11:33 PM, R. Ramesh wrote:
You implied you don't even have a backup of that data, which means you
have exactly one chance of getting it right.  This is a non-starter.

First: you are warned to NEVER proceed with a filesystem resize before
you have a valid, current, and *tested* backup.

You are also warned that the ext4 *conversion* to 64-bit block numbers
so as to be able to span more than 16TB is NOT your typical filesystem
resize operation in the first place.  It touches a *lot more* of the
filesystem and the risks are much higher than just adding an extent.
Even if it works flawlessly, it is not going to result in an optimal
filesystem.

The recommended procedure is to create a *new* filesystem and restore
from backup (or copy from the legacy filesystem if you find a way to
have both at the same time). And for such large filesystems, the use of
"xfs" instead of "ext4" should be seriously considered.

Second: whatever reasons you had, or excuses you gave yourself, nothing
is going to get your data back if the filesystem ends up damaged beyond
repair and you don't have a backup.

"it would require updates that I am not ready do to yet"? Then DON'T.
Find another way to solve your immediate problem, and postpone the
larger filesystem for when you update everything.

You *have* been warned.


Now, you did not give us any idea of what is in that filesystem and what
you use it for, but as an alternative to resizing it, maybe you could
create several extra filesystems instead of enlarging the one you have
and attaching these extra ones to wherever you need more space? Any
subdirectory can be made an entirely separate filesystem...

This wouldn't work for everything (e.g. you can't hardlink or
fast-rename across filesystems), but maybe it would work for whatever
you use that big filesystem for?

--
   Henrique Holschuh
Henrique,

Let us not worry about backup. The data is just videos and not worth the effort. They are all recreatable with some effort. So, it is ok to try resize2fs and if that dies, I will simply get the data from my DVDs/Blurays.

I don't think there is in place ext4 to xfs conversion. So, converting to xfs is less possible that resize2fs.

I am just looking for path of least resistance. That is why I asked if it possible to resize without any upgrade. I will eventually upgrade and eventually figure out something. I just need to hear that there isn't a simple solution I have overlooked *today*. That is all.

Ramesh


It would seem to me that the simplest way to solve this problem would be to buy a second drive that is big enough, format it with xfs, and copy everything you want to keep onto the new drive. Then when everything is done to your satisfaction, you can keep the original drive as a backup, or if you really don't care about backups, reformat the original drive and then use it, for whatever you want. (Make sure you copy the boot setup onto the new drive!)

--doug

Thanks. I have to spend at least $500 to get 12+TB disk. Not a good solution. I will wait it out till a stable resize2fs appears.

Ramesh