Web lists-archives.com

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot




On Mon 17 Apr 2017 at 17:04:57 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:

> On 04/17/2017 02:04 PM, Brian wrote:
> >On Sat 15 Apr 2017 at 00:07:39 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> >
> >>Le 14/04/2017 à 19:05, Richard Owlett a écrit :
> >>
> >>>Does any of this justify a bug report.
> >>
> >>No. The only bug is that the system installed on the SD card boots while it
> >>should not.
> >
> >Why shouldn't the system boot? It has the same kernel that is on the
> >hard disk, And the GRUB versions are the same. Does it matter where the
> >booted kernel resides?
> >
> >Ok. The OP was lucky. Another arrangement between the booted OS and GRUB
> >on the hard disk would possibly have led to a loss of sale for the store.
> >Never using anything but Jessie installs (which is what the OP does) is
> >a disadvantage when GRUB is involved.
> 
> Not quite correct.
> I performed what *I* considered a *WORST CASE TEST*.
> It passed.
> My *minimal* criterion was the ability to read *AND* write the device.

You haven't quite absorbed and understood

https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/04/msg00430.html

I'd suggest you get to grip with its contents.

> CAVEAT LECTORS
>  Before retirement I frequently served in QA/QC roles
>    NOTE BENE: QC is NOT identical to QA
>                though "pickers of nits" frequent both
> 
> Please note my usage of "criterion" rather than "criteria".

I did. I also noted your use of "minimal" rather than "minimum". (I would
not normally point out things like this but times are hard. :) )

-- 
Brian