Web lists-archives.com

Re: Exclude some architectures from an architecture-independent package ?




> On 29 May 2019, at 14:45, Raphaël Halimi <raphael.halimi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm the maintainer of package acpi-call, which is a kernel module
> allowing a user to call ACPI methods. Its build is handled by DKMS.
> 
> The module used to build on all architectures, even if it was obviously
> useless on those which don't support ACPI.
> 
> Starting with Linux 5.2, what used to be a mere warning about
> "acpi_root_dir" set to an undefined value, became an error, and prevents
> the module to be built on architectures which don't support ACPI,
> meaning every one except i386, amd64, ia64 and arm64.
> 
> Since, AFAIK, the "Architecture" field in debian/control doesn't allow
> tuning the "all" wildcard by excluding some architectures, I have
> several (IMHO non-optimal) solutions to fix this:
> 
> 1/ Restrict the architectures to i386, amd64, ia64, arm64 in
> debian/control. This would fix the problem, but will make the mirrors
> hold four copies of nearly identical binary packages, so wasting some
> space (even if it's not much: the binary package holding the module
> source code for DKMS is only 13 KB in size).
> 
> 2/ Keep "arch:all" and set KBUILD_MODPOST_WARN in the module source
> code, to allow build on unsupported architectures.
> 
> 3/ Keep the status quo and close the bug [1] as wontfix (that's what the
> reporter of [2], which is a duplicate of [1], did).
> 
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-call/+bug/1830040
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-call/+bug/1830787
> 
> What would be the "cleanest" solution according to you ?
> 

Hi,

can’t you just “skip” building the module in DKMS when on unsupported architecture?

Install the package on that system would be noop then.

Cheers,
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@xxxxxxxx