Web lists-archives.com

Re: Survey: git packaging practices / repository format




On 28.05.19 19:31, Simon McVittie wrote:

Hi,

> Debian Linux kernel
> ===================
> 
> Tree contains: an incomplete debian/ directory, notably without d/control,
> and no upstream source
> Changes to upstream source are: d/patches only
> Baseline upstream: changelog version => .orig tarball
> Patches managed by: ???
> Special build tool: there is a pre-build step to generate d/control

I'm handling the kernel very differently (actually the offical packages
never actually built at my site), similar to what I've described in
my other mails - layered branches:

* layer 0: upstream tag (linus or greg)
* layer 1: generic patches for making upstream's 'make dep-pkg' work
           with usual debian workflows (eg. not creating debian/rules
           from there anymore, but a generic one instead)
* layer 2: dist and target specific customizations (changelos, .config,
           etc ...)

The whole thing is again is built via dck-buildpackage (dpkg-
buildpackage should also work, but I never called it manually anymore,
since i've wrote dck-buildpackage).

Note that I don't even try to create some one-fits-all superpackage for
all archs, flavours, etc. - instead I'm using separate layer 2 branches
for that.

(for maintaining lots of kernel configs based on some meta config, I've
got a separate tool)


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287