Web lists-archives.com

Re: Cdbs Features

On May 22, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think at this point we can recommend dh, and require debhelper (i.e.,
> the individual dh_* tools could be required to be part of the build
> system, but how they are called can be left to a maintainer's
> discretion, with the assumption that "you use dh or perhaps cdbs, except
> if you're trying to develop something better, but then you still use
> debhelper behind the scenes to do the low-level work"
This looks reasonable to me too.

(Now I am almost sold on dh, BTW.)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature