Web lists-archives.com

Re: Bits from /me: A humble draft policy on "deep learning v.s. freedom"




On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 00:11 -0700, Mo Zhou wrote:
[...]
> People do lazy execution on this problem. Now that a
> related package entered my packaging radar, and I think
> I'd better write a draft and shed some light on a safety
> area. Then here is the first humble attempt:
> 
>   https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/deeplearning-policy
>   (issue tracker is enabled)
[...]

Thanks for this.  Something I don't quite understand is the division
into 3 categories.  You write:

> 2. A ToxicCandy Model refers to a free software licensed model,
> trained from unknown or non-free dataset [...]

> 3. A model is Non-free Model as long as any of the following
> conditions is satisfied: (1) trained from unknown/non-free data [...]

Is category 2 intended to be a subset of category 3, or am I missing
some distinction?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part