Re: Towards lapack / lapack64 packaging
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:50:57 +0800
- From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Towards lapack / lapack64 packaging
On 2019-05-17 09:46, Mo Zhou wrote:
On 2019-05-16 20:39, Gard Spreemann wrote:
Incidentally, and somewhat off-topic: Do you know if a similar effort
being made for the PETSc and SLEPc packages (src petsc and slepc)?
Do you mean 64-bit array indexing support for them?
According to our dependency chain, they are built upon blas and lapack.
That means the blas64 / lapack64 work is a prerequisite.
Certainly we haven't packaged (or thought to package) petsc64.
But of course it is an option if there is demand for it.
As Mo says, we'd want blas64 / lapack64 settled in before commencing.