Re: Towards lapack / lapack64 packaging
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 18:46:30 -0700
- From: Mo Zhou <lumin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Towards lapack / lapack64 packaging
On 2019-05-16 20:39, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> Incidentally, and somewhat off-topic: Do you know if a similar effort is
> being made for the PETSc and SLEPc packages (src petsc and slepc)?
Do you mean 64-bit array indexing support for them?
According to our dependency chain, they are built upon blas and lapack.
That means the blas64 / lapack64 work is a prerequisite.
You can ask the maintainers for more detail: