Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:07:20 +0200
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:22:49PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> > Why Not Make this Change
> > ========================
> I would use dh for any new package and converting trivial packages is...
> trivial. However converting a package with a more convoluted rules files
> will take humanpower. While it may be justified to convert a mildly
> complex rules file on a package that has some activity, I don't think I
> would invest those resources to convert a package that's been working
> for years without anyone touching it's rules files.
Can you give an example for a package that has a non-dh rules file
"working for years" that gives as a result a package with no lintian
warnings without changing this d/rules file?