Web lists-archives.com

Re: Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells"




On 16/04/19 at 08:52 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:55:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >     biococoa (U)         does not use Debhelper (no compat level found) (source version: 2.2.2-4)
> > >     biococoa (U)         should switch to dh. Current build system: cdbs (source version: 2.2.2-4)
> > 
> > | % grep cdbs -r biococoa-2.2.2 
> > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/rules:include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/gnustep.mk
> > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/rules:include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnumakefile.mk
> > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/control:Build-Depends: cdbs,
> > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/changelog:     dh_installsystemd instead -> that's a cdbs issue)
> > | biococoa-2.2.2/debian/changelog:  * debian/control (Build-Depends): Add cdbs and quilt.  Drop gnustep-make
> 
> This explains the cdbs smelling (and I loved to get rid of this but
> this needs to be fixed by gnustep.mk).  But in how far is
> 
>     "no compat level found"
> 
> sensible?

That's because, once lintian sees that the package does not use debhelper
or cdbs, it returns from debhelper.pm and thus doesn't reach the point
where the tag for debhelper-compat-level (which is an addition in my
lintian fork) is emitted.

L.