Web lists-archives.com

Re: Golang >= 1.12 in Buster?

On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:00:18PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I strongly think that this decision very wrong and should be reversed.
> If the RT absolutely insist on cutting down the number of Go versions, I
> am not opposed to see eg. golang-1.11 go, however, as I don't see a
> compelling case for having it. But others may disagree. In this way, I
> fully agree with Eric on this matter.

You shouldn't really complain to the release team, but rather to the
golang maintainers, that couldn't manage to move everything off golang
1.11 in time.
If that really was a issue.

It is not any different from how, e.g. the versions of boost, or llvm
are cut down every so often.

                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature