Web lists-archives.com

Re: Debian vs Linux namespaces




hi,

> since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
> patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.

not every package uses systemd yet, for some systemd still calls init
scripts which do various kinds of broken things.

So thats not necessarily an init system problem.
Its a general problem in Debian of packages not being migrated to
systemd and nobody enforcing that we ship systemd units for all daemons.


Bernd


> 
> Ondrej
> --
> Ondřej Surý
> ondrej@xxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
>> On 23 Mar 2019, at 13:34, Harald Dunkel <harri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
>> do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
>> probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
>> functions).
>>
>> I noticed that containerization and Linux namespaces are not number
>> one priority for Debian, but do you think this could be addressed
>> for Buster? Its pretty annoying if you try to maintain the Debian host
>> system, and a LXC container is affected instead.
>>
>>
>> Thanx in advance
>>
>> Harri
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/888569
>> https://bugs.debian.org/888743
>> https://bugs.debian.org/858837
>> https://bugs.debian.org/924551
>>
> 

-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F