Re: How to deal with meaningless SOVERSION bumps from upstream?
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:41:58 +0100
- From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: How to deal with meaningless SOVERSION bumps from upstream?
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 11:15, Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Mo Zhou:
>> Should I bump the SOVERSION and trigger a transition after the Buster
>> release? (I think it's pointless, as it triggers pointless rebuild for
>> many packages including Qt) Or ignore the upstream SOVERSION bump and
>> track the changes by myself?
> I've been able to convince libidn2 to revert a soname bump recently.
> Maybe this would be an option for double-conversion, too?
I recently reverted useless libzip ABI dump that just dropped one deprecated symbol by adding the no-op function back to the library.