Re: Bug#922643: ITP: build-alternative -- helper to build Debian package with diet libc
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:44:51 +0000
- From: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Bug#922643: ITP: build-alternative -- helper to build Debian package with diet libc
[2019-02-21 00:00] Guillem Jover <guillem@xxxxxxxxxx>
> On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > * Package name : build-alternative
> > Version : 0.0.1
> > Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > * Url : https://salsa.debian.org/kaction/build-alternative
> > * Licenses : GPL-3+
> > Programming Lang : shell
> > Section : devel
> > This package provide makefile snippet, that abstract away
> > several issues, related to building package with diet libc.
> > .
> > * diet libc is not supported on every Debian architecture
> > * code to check for build profiles is repetive
> > .
> > Regular users do not need to install this package, it is only
> > useful to Debian Contributors.
> Hmm this package name looks extremely generic for what it is described
> to be used for. Could you name it something else that includes either
> dietlibc in its name or at least libc or similar?
I do not exclude, that it may include support for musl for future. I am
not sure, whether overly generic name now is worse then misleading
source package name in future.
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once every 24 hours.
If matter is urgent, try https://t.me/kaction