Web lists-archives.com

Re: Remainings of old versions of packages in UDD / tracker




On 08/01/19 at 13:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> I've found the following strange hit:
> 
> udd=> select  source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release = 'sid' ;
>     source     |    version    |                                maintainer                                |                         vcs_browser                          | release 
> ---------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+---------
>  r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.16.1-1      | Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/r-bioc-deseq2.git | sid
>  r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.22.2+dfsg-1 | Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       | https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-deseq2            | sid
> (2 Zeilen)
> 
> 
> which means the source package r-bioc-deseq2 exists twice in sid.  There
> is also an entry in tracker[1] mentioning version 1.16.1-1 which should
> have gone since a long time.  The situation is similar for:
> 
>  r-bioc-genefilter
>  r-bioc-shortread
>  r-bioc-variantannotation
>  r-cran-dplyr
>  r-cran-haplo.stats
>  r-cran-luminescence
>  r-cran-phylobase
>  r-cran-purrr
>  r-cran-raster
>  r-cran-rsqlite
>  r-cran-scales
>  r-cran-surveillance
>  r-cran-tibble
>  r-cran-tidyr
>  r-cran-tidyselect
>  r-other-mott-happy
> 
> 
> Any idea why old versions of these packages might remain in UDD (and
> thus probably in tracker since it is reading UDD)?

Did you check the extra_source_only column?

Lucas