Web lists-archives.com

Re: Remainings of old versions of packages in UDD / tracker

Hi Andreas,

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> cruft versions, usually hold up due to outdated binaries.
> In this case of r-bioc-deseq2, the reason is outdated binaries in
> kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386.
> using rmadison is a very quick way to notice this, as you will see the
> discrepancy in the architecture list.

I see that you started filing a lot of RM requests to remove many of
such outdated binaries.
However I need to ask whether you try to understand what was blocking
those builds.  For example, looking at one of the last bugs you opened
to remove outdated binaries of r-cran-luminescence, I see those don't
seem to build just because r-cran-sp is missing a binNMUs against a new
enough r-base, which is something simple to take care of.

                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature