Web lists-archives.com

Re: Re: usrmerge -- plan B?




On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 07:52:08AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> As long as there is one Debian Developer (or any other person who has the
> right to upload binary packages) who has a merged /usr on his system used
> for building packages, there is a risk of reintroducing the bug through his
> package. Maybe we should somehow, in the short term, modify dpkg to add
> something like "Tainted-By: usr-merge" control field to all binary packages
> produced, if a package is built on a system with merged /usr (detected via
> /bin being a symlink). And a corresponding automatic check that would
> auto-reject binary packages with any Tainted-By control field from being
> uploaded to the Debian archive.
Tainted-By: built-not-on-buildd please.
At the very least Tainted-By: built-not-in-clean-uptodate-sid-chroot.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature