Web lists-archives.com

Re: Re: usrmerge -- plan B?

Marco d'Itri wrote:

On Nov 21, Michael Stone <mstone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

How many long-running production systems do you think people have run
usrmerge on? I'd guess close to zero, since there is no advantage whatsoever
Actually I have quite a lot personally, with exactly zero problems.
On some of them I also enjoy advantages of merged-/usr, like having multiple containers share the same /usr.

I agree with the argument in this thread that usrmerge should be either Essential or not in Buster at all. I have no Debian systems in production, but the company that I have a contract with has some Ubuntu systems, and we are considering (as in: there is a successful PoC) the use of OSTree for deployment of some production systems. OSTree folks recommend merged /usr, so I do install usrmerge in the LXC container that is being used as a "golden" tree for deployment. And it works quite well for us with just a few extra moves and symlinks, and extlinux as the boot loader (to work around removal of GRUB2-related files from the Debian package).

So: my opinion is that I would prefer usrmerge in Essential in Buster, for the benefit of people who use OSTree for deployment, and to reduce divergence between Debian and Ubuntu plans.

Alexander E. Patrakov