Re: Bug#913766: ITP: librsvg-c -- the pre-Rust version of librsvg
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 01:50:12 +0000
- From: James Clarke <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Bug#913766: ITP: librsvg-c -- the pre-Rust version of librsvg
On 15 Nov 2018, at 00:41, Michael Biebl <biebl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 15.11.18 um 01:14 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 15.11.2018 um 00:15 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 5:22 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>>>>> I don't have experience with archive management for non-release
>>>>> architectures at all.
>>>> The problem that we have is that it's not possible to upload a package
>>>> to Debian which does not build any binaries on the release architectures,
>>>> the archive would be removed from the archive immediately.
>> Is that really true?
>> Fwiw, the consolekit package, before it was removed completely, was
>> !linux-any, ie. it was only built for non-release architectures.
> Forgot to add: src:consolekit did not build any arch:all package.
> If you say, that this should not be possible, why did this work for
Because it's not non-release, it's non-ftp-master, and hurd/kfreebsd are on
ftp-master despite being very non-release.