Re: Uncoordinated upload of the rustified librsvg
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 23:46:41 +0100
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Uncoordinated upload of the rustified librsvg
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 10:53:12PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> With this mail, I would like to protest the uncoordinated upload of the rustified
> version of libsrvg to unstable. The maintainer of the package knows very well that
> this particular package has a huge number of reverse dependencies and would cause
> a lot of problems with non-Rust targets now. He also knows very well that I am very
> much interested in Debian Ports and a lot of efforts have been invested there.
Perhaps we should quickly upload a revert, using the last good version of
librsvg, before things degrade? Effectively removing librsvg on 11 archs
(not counting non-official ones) stops any GUI there. Including proverbial
A regression of this scale shouldn't be done lightly. So what about
reverting it now so things don't degrade, then having a flamewar what to do?
A true bird-watcher waves his tail while doing so.