Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 07:53:53 +0200
- From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Sorry, I've just noticed my 'Reply All' email went to ftpmaster@ but
not waldi@, so I assume you missed it.
Please let me (and Lumin) know if you have any further concerns.
Also, there have been two further julia uploads since my last email.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 12:52, Graham Inggs <ginggs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Bastian
> I sponsored Lumin's original upload of Julia 1.0.0-1 and worked with him
> closely, reviewing the commits leading up to the upload. In the
> meantime, Lumin has become a Debian Developer and uploaded the
> subsequent versions himself, although still with some input and testing
> from me.
> I thought Lumin had made it clear enough that being able to obtain a
> stacktrace from within Julia is actually a feature . One of Julia's
> tests checks this, and hence autopkgtests fail if debug symbols are
> missing from sys.so, which is compiled from .jl files, not C/CXX source.
> However, Lumin has now updated the comments in debian/rules  to be
> more explicit.
> For reference, the RM bug Lumin referred to in his previous mail is #903548.
>  https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1.0.0/manual/stacktraces/