Web lists-archives.com

Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support





On 10/13/18 12:58 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 06:01:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> Has policy changed regarding support for multiple inits, or is it just that
>>> no one is maintaining the shim and sysvinit-core?
>>
>> The latter.  systemd-shim has been orphaned for over 2 years, and has
>> RC bugs.   sysvinit currently has two maintainers, but they've only
>> ever made one upload (over a year ago).
> 
> It seems that these facts are either largely ignored or unknown and I
> wonder if some noise should be made so that interested people can pick
> up the work now and not only complain later.


I don't think that is only the smaller issue we are facing here. The
bigger "problems" for those who do not like systemd will be:

- the typical package maintainer won't test initscripts
- more and more upstreams are shipping systemd services only and skip
init script creation.

For my packages I can state that I do not have a single machine which is
not using systemd - and to be honest - I won't waste my time in
writing/debugging initscripts. If there is one, I'll review it if it
looks sane and then maybe ship it. And I'm saying "maybe" here, as for
new packages, I will NOT shit it as active init script because I will
only put stuff in my packages I have tested well enough.

After using a lot of systemd now I will never go back to init scripts.
Systemd comes with a steep learning curve, but one you've stated using
its features you'll never go back.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature