Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:52:53 -0400
- From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:59:59AM +0200, Alex Muntada wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> > As I understand it, alioth-lists.d.n is an interim location
> This is correct, when asked what to do we're encouraging people
> to keep the former lists.alioth.d.o addresses.
> > and folks should migrate to either a lists.d.o list, a
> > tracker.d.o team or pkgname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> FWIW, we're fine with maintainers/teams migrating to lists.d.o,
> tracker.d.o or packages.d.o. Just let us know if any alioth list
> isn't needed anymore ;)
There was at least some impression that the lists.d.o maintainers
weren't enthusiastic of absorbing a large number of team maintainer
addresses as lists. This came up when I was asking if we should
migrate filesystems-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to list.d.o, and one
of the primary maintainers on filesystems-devel thought that was
Is there something official from the lists.d.o maintainers about what
their preferences should be?