Re: concerns about Salsa
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:05:25 +1000
- From: Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: concerns about Salsa
On Monday, 4 June 2018 9:54:32 PM AEST Ian Jackson wrote: > Salsa is hardly the first Debian production service to not be running > the packaged version of its primary application, and it won't be the > last. ftp.debian.org isn't running the packaged version of dak. I think dak is quite different in two ways: * dak is very internal to Debian project. We don't have to package it just for internal consumption. * gitlab was already packaged. If we package it for everybody then we should be able to use it as well. > In practice, I have found that it is much easier to deploy a > production service directly from its git tree. This makes it much > easier to make changes. Interesting. I tend to deploy packages and use whatever problems I experience as incentive to update packaging. "Fix it for yourself and for everyone else" kind of thing is a powerful concept although not always the fastest... -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Do your duty as you see it, and damn the consequences. -- George S. Patton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: concerns about Salsa
- From: Paul Wise
- Re: concerns about Salsa
- References:
- concerns about Salsa
- From: Dmitry Smirnov
- Re: concerns about Salsa
- From: Ian Jackson
- concerns about Salsa
- Prev by Date: Re: concerns about Salsa
- Next by Date: Re: Bug#899299: libu2f-udev: Post-inst script should make udev reload rules
- Previous by thread: Re: concerns about Salsa
- Next by thread: Re: concerns about Salsa
- Index(es):