Re: RFR: email about regressions [was: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions]
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 23:31:26 +0100
- From: Chris Lamb <lamby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: RFR: email about regressions [was: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions]
> Please find a proposed text for such an e-mail below. Comments or
> improvements very welcome.
Just some brief and somewhat-pedantic suggestions for improvements
below. Beyond that, I'd love to see some parsable X-Foo: headers. I
find these very helpful in the BTS's mails to reliably file things
in my email setup.
> Subject: New version of $trigger breaks autopkgtest of $broken in testing
> As recently announced¹ Debian is now running autopkgtests in testing to
I've been big Unicode fan ("... ever since the release of their 1980
album, Duke", etc.) but I find this style of numbering really quite
difficult to read/parse in the middle of text with my particular
combination of typeface, font size, antialiasing and screen resolution.
Either that or I'm getting old.
> check if migration of a new source package causes regressions. It does
> this with the binary packages of the new version of a source package
> a regression in a reverse dependency can come due to one of the
> To avoid stepping on peoples toes, this e-mail is not automatically
> generating a bug in the bts
generate a bug in the BTS
Thanks again for working on this. :)
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` lamby@xxxxxxxxxx / chris-lamb.co.uk