Re: filing bug reports for GCC 8 build failures
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 15:49:26 +0200
- From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: filing bug reports for GCC 8 build failures
On 03/05/2018 09:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>>> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean?
>> They were filed by Lucas Nussbaum, e.g. #897518, #897507,
>> these use grib_api.mod from libeccodes-dev.
>> These fail because they need eccodes-dev to be built with gfortran8.
>> Others will use netcdf.mod , etc.
> I can't see any gfortran-8 involvement for these issues.
My error, sorry (but we still need to plan the gfortran-8 transition).
What happened here is that I moved the .mod file in libeccodes-dev to
/usr/include/$ARCH, to make the package multi-arch capable. While gcc
looks there for header files, gfortran does _not_, which is inconsistent
and a challenge.
Is this deliberate, or will a patch to multiarch-enable gfortran be
Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@xxxxxxxx>, <mckinstry@xxxxxxxxxx>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered.