Re: Questionable mass bug filling
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 21:37:35 +0200
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Questionable mass bug filling
On 04/21/2018 05:36 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On April 21, 2018 3:05:54 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand <zigo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Helmut,
>> Also, some of the bugs are questionable at least. While yes, the python
>> modules can't be imported, it doesn't seem it's been done in the
>> of actually using the Python module. For example, importing a sphinx
>> plugin python module without having sphinx being installed is kind of a
>> useless test. In reality, you wouldn't do that, you'd just invoke
> I see your point about the practical implications of this kind of bug, but I think the bug is valid. It's a missing depends since the plugin needs sphinx to work.
> Scott K
Right. I've spent a few hours to fix it on all of my packages anyways.
The only thing I regret at this point, is filling the bug twice instead
of only once (ie: only once for both py2 and py3 is enough). It was hard
to read in the BTS, and it's now kind of a mess, even though all bugs
are closed, I believe.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)