Re: Usage of real m68k hardware
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:24:12 +0300
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Usage of real m68k hardware
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:26:28AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The chances of anyone really wanting to run some of this scientific
> software on m68k seem remote, so it feels like it would be an overall
> reduction of friction if the maintainer could just say "I don't support
> this arch" and the porters could stop looking at those packages (unless
> for some reason they disagree with the maintainer and think users of that
> arch are really interested).
The core problem is that in the control file the permitted syntax for
the Architecture: filed is much more restricticted than the permitted
syntax for (build) dependencies.
Dependency fields have negative syntax like !m68k, for the Architecture:
field this is only possible with a complete list of all architectures
except the one you want to exclude.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed