Web lists-archives.com

Re: interpretation of wontfix

On Mar 28, Simon McVittie <smcv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is this how most people interpret wontfix? I'd usually interpreted it as
> an indication of policy rather than priority: "I acknowledge that this
> is a bug, but it isn't going to change, even if you provide a patch".
This is how I see it: keeping the bug around as documentation to prevent 
other people opening it again.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature