Web lists-archives.com

Re: library package with conffile and SONAME?

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 09:43 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Philipp Hahn <pmhahn@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 3. And/or I can create an additional package "libtirpc-common" to just
> > contain that single conffile and make "libtirpc[13]" both depend on it.
> > This last option is AFAIK frowned upon as it creates yet another package
> > for a single file.
> > So whats the current best practice?
> Policy requires 3.  Yes, it creates another package, but the ability to
> install two versions of a shared library at the same time is vital to how
> we do upgrades and is more important than avoiding the occassional extra
> package.
> The other option is to version the configuration file so that each SONAME
> of the library uses a separate config file, but usually that's worse for
> the user and it's better to just have a separate config package.

Or you make the configuration file not a conffile.  (Then you have the
challenge of getting dpkg to forget that it was ever a conffile.)


Ben Hutchings
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part