Web lists-archives.com

Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW process

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:15:10PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > A changelog bloated with every replaced attempt is hard to read; gaps in
> > version numbering that come without an explanation also raise an eyebrow
> > (thus such a gap needs a comment in the changelog).
> How many replaced attempts are we typically talking about ?
A lot?

> When an attempt is replaced, the reviewer would no doubt like not only
> the whole new package, but a human-readable summary of what the
> submitter has intentionally changed.  How do you think that
> human-readable summary ought to be communicated to the reviewer ?
As a reply to the email containing the review?

Please look at debian-mentors@ if you have additional questions. Thank


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature