Web lists-archives.com

Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW process




On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:34:28PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> What might be reasonable is making the separation between binNEW and srcNEW
> more obvious, especially for us on the other side.  This would also
> encourage the ftpmasters to skip license checks for binNEW -- but again,
> without knowing their workflow I'm not in a position to improve it.

I know for a fact that quite regularly licence checks on binNEW packages
causes RC bugs to pop up.  I acknowledge it may be a burder for the ftp
team, but that reason alone probably deserves to keep binNEW as it is.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature