Web lists-archives.com

Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW process


On Mon, Mar 05 2018, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> I'm not sure you actually read what I wrote since I wrote that I
> thought REQUIRING the revision to be bumped was a bad idea and you
> gave me a case where it made sense to do so.  Nowhere in this thread
> have I ever said bumping the revision is inherently a bad idea.

Thanks.  I did read this, and wasn't trying to argue against the
position that bumping the revision is bad.  But my e-mail might have
made it seem that I didn't pay enough attention to what you wrote, so
please accept my apologies for writing with insufficient care.

Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature