Web lists-archives.com

Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW process

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 14:51 +0000, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> > In many cases, there is an issue open about the new binary package
> (In my experience, there is not.)
> > When there is no bug report open at all, well, bad luck.
> Well, possbibly, but if one is investing time and effort in changing a
> process it seems a shame not to cover these cases IMHO. :)

I think that in cases there a package lands in NEW because it's added
a new binary package, or changed the name of one of its binary
packages, any package could be filed against the *source* package.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part