Re: A proposal for improving transparency of the FTP NEW process
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 14:31:04 +0100
- From: Ole Streicher <olebole@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: A proposal for improving transparency of the FTP NEW process
Philip Hands <phil@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Short version: Use the salsa per-package issue tracker for problems
>> that come up with the review in NEW.
> Is there any significant benefit that this brings over having the same
> interaction in the BTS?
> I realise that Gitlab is the new shiny thing, but there is a cost to
> using two issue tracking mechanisms when one would do, and for packages
> where the maintainer is not actually using salsa, what then?
I would rather like to see the salsa issue page to the BTS (so that "new
issue" would create a new BTS entry).