Web lists-archives.com

Re: A proposal for improving transparency of the FTP NEW process

Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Short version: Use the salsa per-package issue tracker for problems
> that come up with the review in NEW.

Is there any significant benefit that this brings over having the same
interaction in the BTS?

I realise that Gitlab is the new shiny thing, but there is a cost to
using two issue tracking mechanisms when one would do, and for packages
where the maintainer is not actually using salsa, what then?

Cheers, Phil.
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature