Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] three.js_80+dfsg2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Pirate Praveen dijo [Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 03:15:42PM +0530]:
> >> 1. If a single ftp master is in disagreement, there should be a team
> >> decision (in previous cases of disagreement also, other team members did
> >> not get involved).
> > 
> > I'm lost already, sorry. As I understand the case of three.js's recent
> > rejection, no other ftp-master said anything and thus there cannot be
> > any dissention.
> I think it would be better if that is made explicit else how many days
> should someone wait to see no response and assume no dissent? or is to
> be always assumed there won't be any dissent?

We should not wait for dissent just forever. The issue you mention was
rejected by ftp-masters, then brought to the TC, then dismissed by the
TC as not-our-role-to-overrule-delegates, and some more days
passed. Do you really think there's a brewing dissent within the
ftp-masters team that has not yet bubbled to become public?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature