Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] three.js_80+dfsg2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED




On വ്യാഴം 01 മാർച്ച് 2018 03:48 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14963 March 1977, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> 
>> 1. If a single ftp master is in disagreement, there should be a team
>> decision (in previous cases of disagreement also, other team members did
>> not get involved).
> 
> I wonder why you think "a single ftpmaster". We are a team. We closely
> coordinate what we do and how we do it. When one of us rejects, the team
> rejects - it just happens to be a random one of us doing it. Others do
> not need to get involved and review everything. Or we wouldn't ever be
> able to get anything done if each of us always has to weight in on any
> single issue.
> 

Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking about it more like how the
courts work in India (possibly in other countries too). When a single
judge decides on a case, there is always an option to appeal to larger
bench (more number of judges).

The team as a whole has to weigh in only when the decision of a single
team member is challenged and such a review is requested.

There are also cases the same criteria was applied differently by two
different ftp masters. node-babel-preset-env was rejected for depending
on itself, but node-rollup was accepted even though it depended on
rollup (a binary package created by node-rollup).

I don't think it is healthy to not have an option of reviewing
individual members decisions.

That leaves me only GR as a possible escalation route. I will think
about it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature